In a thought-provoking address in Delhi, outgoing Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud highlighted the essence of judicial independence, stressing that it does not equate to consistently ruling against the government. Chief Justice Chandrachud, set to demit office on November 10, reflected on the complex dynamics of judicial autonomy, particularly when it comes to public perception and pressure.
The Chief Justice noted that he was labeled “very independent” when the Supreme Court struck down the electoral bonds scheme as unconstitutional on February 15, marking a significant decision against the government. However, he cautioned against the misconception that a verdict favoring the government signifies a lack of independence. “Independence,” he clarified, “means deciding in accordance with the law and the Constitution, not public approval.”
He emphasized that, traditionally, judicial independence was seen as freedom from executive influence, but today, with the advent of social media, pressure groups and interests often sway public opinion on court rulings. He stated, “If you do not decide in my favour, you are not independent—this is what I object to.”
The Chief Justice urged the public to allow judges “the freedom to decide as they feel where the balance of justice lies,” underscoring that a vibrant judiciary must rule based on law, regardless of whom it favors. His remarks aim to reinforce trust in the judiciary’s commitment to justice and the rule of law.
