The Supreme Court today expressed serious concerns over the CBI’s arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal while he was already in judicial custody in connection with the liquor policy case investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The court highlighted the necessity of obtaining judicial permission before re-arresting an individual already in custody, emphasizing the importance of adhering to proper legal procedures.
During the hearing of Kejriwal’s pleas challenging his arrest by the CBI and seeking regular bail, the Supreme Court questioned the agency’s actions. “When someone is in custody, arresting them again requires the court’s permission. This is a clear provision under the criminal procedure code,” remarked the bench.
Representing Kejriwal, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi stressed the need for safeguards against such actions. “You can’t be trigger-happy… You can’t just barge in to arrest without any basis,” Singhvi argued, underscoring the importance of following due process.
The Supreme Court’s remarks come amid heightened political tension surrounding the ongoing investigations. The case continues to draw significant public attention, with the court’s decision likely to have broader implications for the legal framework governing arrests during judicial custody.
Further hearings are expected as the court considers the legality of Kejriwal’s arrest by the CBI and the grounds for his bail.
